Archive for the 'Eric Barker' Category

Barker’s Classic Movies #6: VERTIGO *****

Wednesday, June 15th, 2005

“Too late. It’s too late, there’s no bringing her back.”

- Scottie Ferguson

 vertigo5.jpg

Vertigo (1958)

running time: 2 hr., 7 m. / original studio: Paramount Pictures

produced & directed by Alfred Hitchcock; screenplay by Alec Coppel & Samuel Taylor, from novel D’Entre les Morts by Pierre Boileau and Thomas Narcejac; director of photography, Robert Burks; edited by George Tomasini; music by Bernard Herrmann

with: James Stewart (Scottie), Kim Novak (Madeleine/Judy), Barbara Bel Geddes (Midge), Tom Helmore (Gavin Elster)

If ever there was a movie that illustrated the unpredictable whims of art and commerce, it is Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo. When first released in the summer of 1958, during the most productive and profitable era of Hitchcock’s career, Vertigo was a box-office disappointment, considered by audiences and critics alike to be nothing more than an unsatisfying curiosity from a popular entertainer. But as film studies blossomed in the sixties and Hitchcock’s image began to change, Vertigo accumulated recognition from many different quarters around the world, gaining in stature until it is now regarded as one of the greatest films ever made, a hypnotic masterpiece of uncomfortable insight and disturbing beauty. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #5: GOLDFINGER ****½

Friday, May 20th, 2005

In May, the moviegoer’s fancy turns wistfully to the sustained adrenalin rush. It’s an appropriate time, then, to revisit the granddaddy of modern action/adventure movies:

goldfinger1.jpg

Goldfinger (1964)

running time: 1 hr., 52 m. / original studio: United Artists

produced by: Harry Saltzman and Albert R. Broccoli

directed by Guy Hamilton; screenplay by Richard Maibaum and Paul Dehn, from novel by Ian Fleming; director of photography, Ted Moore; edited by Peter Hunt; music by John Barry

with: Sean Connery (James Bond), Honor Blackman (Pussy Galore), Gert Fröbe (Auric Goldfinger), Harold Sakata (Oddjob), Shirley Eaton (Jill Masterson)

Woman: My name is Pussy Galore.

Bond: I must be dreaming.

Visually dazzling, outlandishly funny, jazzy, sexy and unceasingly inventive, Goldfinger was the third film in the James Bond series and it remains the best. It isn’t a great movie in the Citizen Kane/Lawrence of Arabia/Godfather sense, but it is a classic guilty pleasure and a landmark film from a turbulent decade, bursting with a period style and panache that changed moviemaking and moviegoing in ways which are still with us, for better and for worse. For instance: there had been many blockbuster movies before, single films that somehow hit the right chords with the paying audience, but Goldfinger turned the Bond movies into the first blockbuster franchise, a studio chief’s wet dream, a brand name that was guaranteed to pack houses every time. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #4: AMADEUS *****

Thursday, April 28th, 2005

Mozart: Do you believe in it?…A fire which never dies, burning you forever?

Salieri: (a pause) Oh, yes.

Amadeus (1984)

amadeus2.jpg

running time: 2 hr., 40 m. / original studio: Orion / original rating: PG

directed by Milos Forman; screenplay by Peter Shaffer, from his play; director of photography, Miroslav Ondricek; edited by Michael Chandler; music supervisor: Sir Neville Marriner conducting the Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields

with: F. Murray Abraham (Salieri), Tom Hulce (Mozart), Elizabeth Berridge (Constanze Mozart), Simon Callow (Emanuel Schikaneder)

The confessions of Antonio Salieri, a classical composer who claimed that he murdered Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Made near the middle of the 1980s, a decade generally known for the triumph of crass commercialism over any kind of aesthetic value in the movies, Amadeus is the exception to the rule, a sensuous fantasia in period costume that speculates upon one of life’s greatest mysteries, the origin and nature of musical genius, with unapologetic wit, exuberance and style. I know of no other film in English that uses cinematic grammar so deftly, with such mastery of its highs and lows, to convey emotions and ideas that should be inexplicable: the all-consuming experience of creativity at its peak; the exhilaration of recognizing a true, almost magical brilliance in another person; and the damnation of a well-earned, inextinguishable jealousy. (more…)

Film Review: CLOSER ** (out of 5)

Tuesday, March 29th, 2005

 

closer.jpg

Partner and allegiance swapping between two trendy couples in contemporary London.

Because Closer is a Mike Nichols movie, and because it’s adapted from a successful play, has only four characters, and those four characters seem to lift the bar on just how dirty people are allowed to talk in an American movie, there were a lot of pre-release comparisons between it and Who’s Afraid of Virginia Woolf?, Nichols’ stunning directorial debut from so many years ago. But there the comparisons should end; it’s not just that Closer’s playwright, Patrick Marber, is no Edward Albee (nor am I saying he should try to be), it’s that the whole cultural landscape has changed irrevocably. The movies are different, obviously successful plays are different, and most especially, movie stars are different. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #3: BRINGING UP BABY *****

Tuesday, March 15th, 2005

Bringing Up Baby (1938)

baby1.jpg

running time: 1 hr., 42 m. / original studio: RKO

produced & directed by Howard Hawks; screenplay by Dudley Nichols & Hagar Wilde, from story by Wilde; director of photography, Russell Metty; edited by George Hively

with: Katharine Hepburn (Susan), Cary Grant (David), Charlie Ruggles (Maj. Applegate), May Robson (Aunt Elizabeth)

A zany socialite sets her cap for a handsome paleontologist, but her plans are skewed by the arrival of an unwanted gift: a full-grown leopard.

The very essence of screwball comedy, and in many ways its zenith, Bringing Up Baby is an hour and three-quarters of stylishly choreographed madness, starring two of the most compelling and dazzling movie stars in the history of the medium, Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn. A virtual catalogue of pratfalls, mistaken identities, outlandish double-entendre, continuous plot reversals and escalating comic mayhem, Bringing Up Baby is almost exhausting the first time you watch it, so much is being fired at you at any given moment. But it is well worth multiple viewings. This is among the handful of movies that just grow funnier and funnier, and frankly astonishing, each time you see them. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #2: INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS *****

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005

For February, with the noise of Oscar season reaching its zenith, I’m going to be churlish and recommend a movie that didn’t receive a single nomination, from anyone, anywhere…

invasion4.jpg

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

running time: 1h., 20m. / original studio: Allied Artists

directed by Don Siegel; screenplay by Daniel Mainwaring, from Collier’s Magazine serial The Body Snatchers by Jack Finney; director of photography, Ellsworth Fredericks; edited by Robert S. Eisen; music by Carmen Dragonwith: Kevin McCarthy (Dr. Miles Bennell), Dana Wynter (Becky Driscoll), Larry Gates (Dr. Dan Kauffman), King Donovan (Jack Bellicec), Carolyn Jones (Teddy Bellicec)

“People are pods. Many of my associates are certainly pods…To be a pod means that you have no passion, no anger, the spark has left you…of course, there’s a very strong case for being a pod…It happens to leave you in a very dull world but that, by the way, is the world that most of us live in.” — director Don Siegel

“They’re here already! You’re next! You’re next!” — Kevin McCarthy as Dr. Miles Bennell

There isn’t a wasted moment in one of my all-time favorite movies, Don Siegel’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, a nightmarish little masterpiece that tapped into and articulated the general unease which crept across America as the Cold War took shape. It has often been misread as an allegory for conservative paranoia over the spread of Communism, but Invasion is a much smarter movie than that — much smarter. A science fiction thriller about dehumanization and denial in a century of monstrous crimes, Invasion of the Body Snatchers can support multiple interpretations, including the opposite view that it is a pointed critique of McCarthyism. As the Saturday Night Live joke used to go, “It’s a floor wax and a dessert topping!” It’s a right-wing fantasy, it’s a left-wing fantasy, it’s neither and both, a fever dream of America in troubled times, made right in the center of those troubled times.

The plot of Invasion is practically American folklore by now, although thankfully its characters don’t know that: Dr. Miles Bennell returns early from a convention to his hometown of Santa Mira because many of his patients have been asking for him. People he’s known all his life have suddenly become convinced that their family members are imposters, and despite every bromide that Miles can fabricate out of his own scientific prejudices, nothing convinces them otherwise. And then, twenty-four hours later everything is fine, as if all they had to do was sleep on it and wake up cured.

And that is exactly how the genuinely creepy invaders of this film have taken over — not with spectacular war machines destroying American landmarks willy-nilly, but through seed pods from space that silently, peacefully, steal our bodies and minds while we’re sleeping. The only thing wrong with the pods’ otherwise perfect replication of human beings is their placidity, their self-satisfied lack of compassion. As a matter of fact, if you want to get the pod people really stirred up, just show some emotion and you’ll have a whole town full of them after you.

Shot in twenty-three days for just half a million dollars, Invasion is an exemplar of low budget storytelling, unfolding tersely, using up just enough running time to introduce Miles, the townspeople, and a hint of romance with his old flame Becky Driscoll, and then the bottom drops out and the film slides headlong toward chaos without a pause. Its dreadful premise is not the mere threat of an impending takeover by inhuman creatures but the slow, horrific dawning that, as Miles screams at the finale, they’re here already, dim bulb. The invasion is over, and there’s no one left except you.

The argument that Invasion is paranoid, anti-Red propaganda hinges on the idea that a Communist takeover of America would be just this sort of insidious, quiet invasion: nothing would seem to be going wrong on the surface, and then one day you would just wake up without your capitalist soul. Like a McCarthyite’s fantasy of life in a Commie world, the film’s pod people have a regimented, unquestioning society, illustrated in one of the film’s most disturbing scenes: Miles and Becky watching in disbelief as their former friends and neighbors gather in the Santa Mira town square, casually lining up behind trucks filled with fresh pods, receiving orders to distribute the things in an ever widening circle outside the city limits.

Actual pod philosophy, however, contradicts the whole Red Scare reading. As Dr. Kauffman, Miles’ pleasant, disarming colleague, sums it up: “Now just think, less than a month ago Santa Mira was like any other town. People with nothing but problems. Then out of the sky came a solution…There’s no pain. Suddenly while you’re asleep, (the pods will) absorb your minds. Your memories. And you’re reborn into an untroubled world.”

An untroubled world: Kauffman speaks in the reasonable and soothing tones of an appliance salesman, or a Midwestern minister. It’s the language of advertising, not the Comintern, it’s the constant, gentle prodding from the consumer society telling you to buy off your discomfort, remake yourself without effort, and don’t worry, be happy. Later, as Miles eavesdrops on his secretary’s living room, looking for a friend, any friend, he overhears her giving orders to place a pod in her own baby’s crib, “and then there’ll be no more tears.”

This movie is paranoid, all right: it’s deathly afraid we’ll finally find that all-purpose, single-dose sedative for which Americans have always yearned, the one that will permanently kill the pain of doubt, suffering, and empathy with others. The pod people have absolutely no interest in overturning the status quo; they’re all about keeping things exactly as they’ve always been, only without the cognitive dissonance that should be every person’s birthright in the age of nuclear weapons and state sponsored genocide.

* * *

Invasion of the Body Snatchers opens with a distinct film noir atmosphere, capturing real locations with high contrast photography, the shadows deepening with the first nightfall (the whole film takes place over a manic two-and-a-half days). But as the mystery of what is happening to Santa Mira starts coming to the surface, Siegel effortlessly switches over to film noir’s stylistic grandfather German Expressionism, with its skewed angles and distorted perspectives, giving the film a lasting tinge of madness. Prior to this movie, Siegel’s forte had always been keeping it simple on a tight budget and here he outdid himself, making cheap special effects work by using them creatively and sparingly, and applying basic film craft — expressive lighting, clever editing, great character faces — to make one of the best films of the 1950s from any genre.

Of course, since it was the fifties and the film was science fiction, Invasion wasn’t reviewed by a single major critic of the day. Siegel tried, knowing he had made the best film of his career so far, by arranging free screenings for the press but he was conspicuously ignored. No self-respecting critic of the day would stoop to reviewing a small indie film about something that could never happen. Even so, Invasion did modestly well at the box office, turning a profit for the studio because, as often happens, the much-maligned audience was a step ahead of both critics and exhibitors.

But Invasion made its real impact later, after French cineastes discovered Don Siegel and started calling him an auteur, and then Allied Artists started leasing its catalogue to television stations, where the film played late shows after the local news. That was how I first saw it, as an eleven-year-old of the sixties, sitting on the floor in front of the TV after the rest of the family was in bed. Already an aficionado of weird and fantastic cinema, I thought it had some really good, exciting scenes, though it didn’t particularly scare me.

Actually, Invasion scares me a lot more now. I was a sophisticated viewer then, but not so much that I understood things like political witch hunts and the ever-lurking madness of crowds, or that the Everyday world sometimes harbors a fascist element (it’s called conformity), or that there is a struggle to keep your humanity as you get older, when a long memory becomes entangled with betrayed ideals, betrayed relationships, and an historical awareness of what can happen when fear takes over a society. These are the things going bump in the suburban night of Don Siegel’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which is more akin to a ghost story for adults than it is a straight horror movie. If it is allegorical, then its true subject is the anxiety felt by an overworked culture that never gets enough sleep, and that consequently feels a slow draining of hope and love from the world.

Though Invasion has been remade twice, first by Philip (The Right Stuff) Kaufman in 1978, and then by Abel (Bad Lieutenant) Ferrara in 1994, both films in color, both with bigger budgets and marquee names, neither version comes close to the sense of mounting hysteria Siegel’s film achieves in just eighty minutes. The remakes are exercises in belaboring the point, and the well-known Hollywood tendency to carelessly screw around with what was done right the first time. The original remains the gold standard of fifties science fiction cinema because, moment-by-moment, it projects an earned awareness of the violation we feel when our house — or our worldview — has been robbed.

Invasion isn’t a perfect movie, but I think the imperfections only add to its glory as the consummate low budget chiller. The music by Carmen Dragon (yes, a real person’s name) is of a style that has gone out of fashion, overbearing and jarring, but it keeps viewers’ attention where it belongs. This isn’t a film to relax with: Remember what happens to those who fall asleep. And the framing device, in which a crazed Miles tells his story to a skeptical psychiatrist, is a famous example of a studio imposing a so-called happy ending where it wasn’t needed, but in the end it fails to dilute what has gone before. Siegel was forced to come back to the film and add it on, seven months after production had wrapped, yet he devised a brilliant little set piece which harkens back to the first great work of film Expressionism, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919). In that movie, too, a madman tells the tale, only the twist at the end is, well, he’s a madman. The final twist of Siegel’s film inverts the Caligari effect: Miles is certainly raving, but he has good reason.

Invasion has sometimes been shown in a “Director’s Cut,” without the framing story and shortened by four minutes, but the truth is, nothing could soften the impact of Miles’ journey from complacent, small town doctor to terrified, hunted man. This was a common side effect of both Noir and Expressionist styles: they take us so deeply into the shadows of a movie’s world that no happy-fied finale, however well-crafted, can cover the taste of dark truth, or pure fear, or pitiless Fate, which has formed the center of the film (for instance, It’s a Wonderful Life, 1946).

Very well acted by an ensemble of working professionals, many of whom will be familiar to fans of Nick-at-Nite. Great moments to look forward to: the body on the pool table awakening; the pods in the greenhouse, stealing identities during a dinner party; Miles and Becky fleeing Santa Mira with sirens blaring and the whole town on their heels; and that final, blood-curdling kiss.

NOTES:

Released 49 years ago this month, in February 1956.

Selected for preservation by the National Film Registry in 1994.

DID McCARTHY GET THE PART BECAUSE OF HIS NAME?: the film’s star Kevin McCarthy (b. 1914) is the younger brother of novelist Mary McCarthy (The Group) and the cousin of former Democratic Presidential candidate Eugene McCarthy. He made his film debut in 1944 and has more than fifty films and forty television shows to his credit, including a winking appearance in the ’70s remake of Invasion. Still acting at the age of 91, he has toured the U.S. for the last 20 years in Give ‘Em Hell, Harry, the one-character play about Harry Truman.

THE WRITERS: novelist Jack Finney (1911-1995) worked in several genres besides science fiction, including mysteries and literary fiction. The Body Snatchers is one of his more unsettling efforts. Finney scoffed at the idea that social conformity was its real subject, but there is little doubt he was dealing with the loss of compassion in uncertain times, and the human tendency to escape into utopian solutions, a frequent theme in his work.

The film version’s decidedly noir edge comes from adapter Daniel Mainwaring (1902-1977). An unusual screenwriter for any era, he managed to work steadily and without a break for almost thirty years in the movie business. He also had time to be a pulp novelist, writing Build My Gallows High under a pseudonym and then adapting it for the screen himself, where it became Out of the Past (1947), one of the essential films noir.

The great writer-director Sam Peckinpah (1925-1984), notoriously difficult to get along with, later claimed that he was the person responsible for the quality of the Invasion script, often telling interviewers that he’d done a complete, uncredited rewrite on location. He may have touched up a few scenes during the shoot, and he did win himself a walk-on role as a meter reader in Miles’ basement, but the verifiable facts are that Daniel Mainwaring finally complained to the Writers Guild, and they told Peckinpah to put a lid on it. Apparently, creating an American classic, The Wild Bunch (1969), wasn’t good enough for him.

SLUMMING, AND HAPPILY: Like several other B-moviemakers of the fifties, Don Siegel (1912-1991) had a more distinguished background than he admitted to, studying at Cambridge and the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in England. He began as a second unit director and editor for Warner Brothers in the thirties and forties, then directed many potboilers of the fifties with imaginative style and speed. Especially notable for the quip, “If you shake a movie, ten minutes will fall out,” he received due recognition in the U.S. rather late in his career, after making Clint Eastwood into a superstar with the challenging Dirty Harry (1971). Eastwood has often credited Siegel as his mentor, both as an actor and director.

Siegel’s work sometimes appears ideologically motivated, but only if you’re looking for it; he cannot be pinned down to left or right. Other worthwhile films by this secretly thoughtful craftsman: Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954), The Killers (1964), The Beguiled (1971), Charley Varrick (1973), The Shootist (1976).

THE DVD: Artisan Entertainment released an excellent widescreen transfer of Invasion in 1998, at the dawn of the DVD revolution. It still works fine. There are no extras to speak of, but they’re not missed; the movie’s the thing, and no-extras also means very affordable ($10 at DVD Planet).

If you’ve only seen the pan-and-scan version on the late show, you’ll be blown away by cinematographer Ellsworth Fredericks’ fantastic compositions. Though the original film was cropped for a 2:1 widescreen back in ’56, it’s still like getting an all new movie. The pan-and-scan versions (sometimes called Full Screen) have been made from that same cropped image, which is why they’re always grainy and slightly out of focus.

Eric Barker is an independent filmmaker and writer living in Denver.

Barker’s Classic Movies #1 was The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

Barker’s Classic Movies #1: THE TREASURE OF THE SIERRA MADRE *****

Wednesday, January 12th, 2005

In the age of DVD, Netflix and Turner Classic Movies, there’s never an excuse to be bored. Each month, Eric Barker offers up a cinematic treat, the best of the best from 110 years of moviemaking, the films that you should know, and love, and collect, and why…

 The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

treasure4.jpg

2h., 6m. / original studio: Warner Brothers

directed by John Huston; screenplay by John Huston, from novel by B. Traven; director of photography, Ted McCord; edited by Owen Marks; music by Max Steiner

with: Humphrey Bogart (Dobbs), Walter Huston (Howard), Tim Holt (Curtin), Bruce Bennett (Cody), Barton MacLane (Pat McCormick), Alfonso Bedoya (Gold Hat)

“You know, the worst ain’t so bad when it finally happens. Not half as bad as you figure it’ll be before it’s happened.” — Tim Holt as Curtin

One of the true wonders of Classic Hollywood and one of the best movies ever made, John Huston’s The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is a singularity in the annals of American moviemaking, a big budget, major studio film so far off the beaten track, it would frighten away any self respecting film executive even yet. (more…)

Film Review: THE AVIATOR **** (out of 5)

Thursday, December 30th, 2004

 aviator1.jpg

The amazing world of daredevil tycoon Howard Hughes, before an array of untreated neuroses turned him into the 20th century’s most famous recluse.

It’s a sure sign that a film director has attained immortality when his most dynamic innovations have moved beyond the shock of the new and become so absorbed into the state of the art, they seem to be inevitable rules of movie grammar. This can work against the director if he isn’t careful — his new films can begin to seem like retreads, or stubborn attachment to a certain style, rather than an ongoing engagement with the things that matter in life.

This has sometimes been true of Martin Scorsese, a first rank iconoclast who remains a serious, redoubtable artist in the age of corporate Hollywood. During his long rise to legendary status, he has honed an audio/visual style that makes full use of the cinema’s many palettes – a constantly moving camera to match his storylines, bold shifts between color and black-and-white, multiple camera speeds and point of view, and soundtracks so densely layered they are almost a physical sensation.  (more…)

Film Review: KILL BILL VOL. 2 **** (out of 5)

Thursday, April 22nd, 2004

 uma.jpg

The deadliest woman in the world, a.k.a. The Bride, continues a revenge quest against her former associates, moving ever closer to Bill, the mentor who could not let her go.

And after the longest first act in the history of Western cinema, Quentin Tarantino’s magnum “grind house” opus Kill Bill finally settles into some storytelling with resonance. Where Vol. 1 was the quintessence of a fairgrounds roller-coaster, all speed and frenzy and showy quotation, Vol. 2 plunges into the world Tarantino has created, as only he can, and soaks us in archetypal narrative twists and the radiance of Uma Thurman at the peak of her beauty and talent. If the first half was light as rice paper, the second delivers the weight of a pulp novel, revealing The Bride’s relationship with Bill, the training that turned her into a superhero capable of overcoming any obstacle, and Tarantino’s own ruminations on single motherhood and the true meaning of Superman — not Nietzsche’s Übermensche, of course, but the Jerry Siegel-Joe Shuster comic book creation.

I was not particularly blown away by Vol. 1 back in October for a variety of reasons (more…)

Film Review: THE PASSION OF THE CHRIST ** (out of 5)

Friday, March 5th, 2004

The final hours of Jesus of Nazareth, from his doubts in the Garden of Gethsemane to his crucifixion on Golgotha, rendered in excruciatingly graphic, apocalyptic detail.

Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ is a movie that has stirred vigorous controversy in nearly every quarter of American life, a bold, confrontational exercise in redefining current religious discourse. Gibson’s most interesting accomplishment, in fact, has been his ability to promote this movie at a vulnerable time in the life of the United States, when the nation is in conflict with terrorists who use religious dread to motivate their soldiers, and all good presidential candidates must give the correct answer if asked about their devotion to God, which they most certainly will be if they don’t volunteer. In such an atmosphere, with ticket sales soaring beyond all reasonable expectations and film critics scrambling to become biblical authorities before their deadlines, it’s almost impossible to give the film any kind of objective critique.

Nevertheless, I’m going to try. Mel and his Passion deserve the same balanced consideration as any other film in our Age of Hype. That is to say, before trashing or praising any movie, it’s important to examine the various elements of the movie itself, from the all-important screenplay to the director’s creation of an onscreen world and the contributions of his collaborators, to look beyond the surface of the movie, including its controversies, and discover its real merits as a piece of filmmaking. (more…)

Still Creepy After All These Years

Monday, October 27th, 2003

 (click thumbnails for larger view)

Some Great Movie Classics for a Chill October Night

nosferatu2.jpg

I’m always up for a good horror movie, but Halloween gives me a particularly good excuse to indulge. The opposite of the films that’ll shortly be airing on television for the Christmas season, horror films make us look at possibilities (and other stuff) we’d rather not consider consciously, like fate and our own inevitable demise, the stench of decay inherent in mortality and, my personal favorite, human duality. The darkness we all carry around inside, the beast called humankind, the monster, that good old Jungian Shadow.

Of course, many great movies deal with these themes, but they’re not all certified horror movies. A real horror movie creeps up on you and stays for awhile, it upsets the fabric of nature, makes it hard to continue accepting the reality you’ve been living. The psychic disturbance may last for only an hour, it may last for a couple of days, but you know you’ve been given something to think about.

Make that, worry about. (more…)

Film Review: KILL BILL, VOL. 1 *** (out of 5)

Tuesday, October 14th, 2003

uma2.jpg

A deadly assassin seeks international revenge against the former associates who tried to kill her on her wedding day.

“The 4th film by Quentin Tarantino” — as the opening titles winkingly proclaim Kill Bill Volume 1 to be — is an ultra-violent, live-action-anime salute to trashy cult movies and American pop from the seventies, an exaltation of style for its own sake, and for all of its adrenalin-inducing narrative skill, a strangely distant exercise in moviemaking.

Surely part of the film’s reserve is an unintended by-product of being chopped into two installments by its distributor, Miramax. The decision to do this was made at the last moment for many reasons, not least of which was simply a distressing trend toward the major studios chopping all of their tent pole movies into two installments. As the audience is beginning to figure out, if you split your spectacle into two release dates, you double the potential box-office, provided the first release generates enough good will. Naturally, with a film originally designed to be absorbed in one sitting, there are going to be more loose ends than in a season of the X-Files, but that’s the point — leave ‘em pondering the quirks and unanswered flourishes, and they’ll come back for more. (more…)

Film Review: OPEN RANGE *** (out of 5)

Sunday, August 17th, 2003

A small-time cattleman and his crew run afoul of a wealthy land owner intent on their destruction.

open-range.jpg

An elegiac film about a vanishing way of life, Kevin Costner’s Open Range is the most old-fashioned, emotionally honest Western anyone has dared to make in at least thirty years, maybe longer. Not even Costner’s own Dances with Wolves (1990), which seemed to prove that a worn-out mythology of the West could perform new tricks, showed this much bald respect for a genre which long ago had its day in the sun. In our era of pervasively unearned irony and myopic self-reference, the fact Costner even wanted to make this film, nevermind convincing others to follow him, makes Open Range one of the most daring movies anyone will attempt in 2003, a Quixotic gesture defying the gods of demography. (more…)

Film Review: SEABISCUIT **** (out of 5)

Wednesday, July 30th, 2003

 seabiscuit3.jpg

The true story of a long shot race horse who became a cultural hero during the Great Depression, and of the people who believed in him.

A confluence of many superb talents on both sides of the camera with an archetypal American story about perseverance and courage, Seabiscuit is old-fashioned Hollywood filmmaking at its best, a wonderful movie-movie for an uneven summer season.

It would have been hard to screw it up. The saga of Seabiscuit and his people is so naturally compelling, Laura Hillenbrand’s book about them has been a continual bestseller from the moment it was published in 2001, an amazing true story frequently noted for its ability to make grown men cry (and we all know what tough nuts grown men are, huh?). Seabiscuit, the book, is such a darned good read, it’s tempting to wonder why no one has written it before now, but the story needed a teller of Hillenbrand’s vision, skill and wit before it became special.

By himself, Seabiscuit would be enough classic material for a whole novel: the runt offspring of a famed champion from a long line of ill-tempered winners, he was abused by his original owners, declared incorrigible, raced too often and then rejected. In his first four years of life he had grown from a good natured colt into a vicious, embittered soul who attacked the grooms and resisted all attempts at befriending him. This was the precise moment that Fate, always a better storyteller than mere mortals, brought him together with three unlikely saviors. (more…)

Film Review: PIRATES OF THE CARIBBEAN: THE CURSE OF THE BLACK PEARL *** (out of 5)

Wednesday, July 16th, 2003

“The Pirate’s Code is more of a set of what you’d call ‘guidelines’ than actual rules.” — Geoffrey Rush as the double-villainous Barbossa

pirates2.jpg

A curséd band of artfully tattered, mutinous rapscallions scours the Caribbean in search of a lost medallion, while their former captain is in…let’s just say, casual pursuit.

Going into the Disney-Bruckheimer Pirates of the Caribbean: And So On and So Forth, a $125 million extravaganza filled to the brim with cheeky anachronisms and some really fun visual effects, the foremost concerns on my mind were to get out of the intolerable oven of my apartment, in which I had been baking all weekend, and to see a mindless movie. As the Grail Knight of Spielberg’s Last Crusade (1989) would say, I chose…wisely. (more…)