Archive for the 'Barker's Classics' Category

Barker’s Classic Movies #12: THE LADY EVE *****

Saturday, July 7th, 2007

Maybe every year is a great year for celebrity centennials and I’m just noticing, but at my house, 2007 is particularly rich. Example: July 16 is the 100th birthday of Ruby Katherine Stevens, perhaps my favorite actress of Golden Age Hollywood, better known to the world at large as Barbara Stanwyck. Frequently dismissed as nothing more than a good technician or, as a callow film “buff” once described her to me, “not that pretty” (immediately disqualifying his opinions on the craft of acting in perpetuity), Stanwyck was the greatest, most believable seductress of her time, a slim, cool and omniscient stick of dynamite.

She was more than cute enough for anything you had in mind, and game for it, too, but caveat emptor, here was a creature with a core of mystery too deep for mortal travelers, a real woman who was beyond possession — which is, of course, the very quality that keeps ’em coming back for more.

eve1.jpg

Charles: You’re certainly a funny girl for anybody to meet

who’s just been up the Amazon for a year.

Jean: Good thing you weren’t up there two years.

For most of the 1940s, an upstart screenwriter named Preston Sturges made complete nonsense of the idea that there’s no such thing as an auteur filmmaker, and while he was at it, continually transformed Nonsense itself into Art, just for good measure. As soon as Paramount Pictures gave him a chance to direct his own scripts, after a decade of providing great material for other moviemakers, he unleashed a seemingly impossible flow of creative energy, turning out hit after hit as if he’d found a way to bottle genius. It may be a cliché that the brightest star burns briefest, but in Sturges’ case it was decidedly, woefully true. Not, however, before he’d given us five or six of the funniest movies of all time.

His third film, The Lady Eve, is the best of his best by a hair, which means it’s likely the best comedy of its decade, as well. (more…)

Ten Years After: CITIZEN KANE Tops AFI’s 100 Best List Again

Thursday, June 28th, 2007

Last Wednesday, June 20th, the American Film Institute announced their updated list of the 100 best movies of all time, an enlightening, schizophrenic document with all the usual victories and disappointments. The list was compiled by polling 1,500 film professionals, critics and historians, all of whom chose from a ballot of 400 English language films released between 1895 and 2006. Each expert voted by listing his/her own 100 best, and picking a personal top ten to break any ties. They were asked to make their judgments based upon a film’s historical and cultural significance, lasting popularity, critical recognition and awards (either received or denied, I assume).

kane10.jpg

The filmmakers’, critics’ and historians’ new, all-time Top Ten: 10. The Wizard of Oz (1939) … 9. Vertigo (1958) … 8. Schindler’s List (1993) … 7. Lawrence of Arabia (1962) … 6. Gone with the Wind (1939) … 5. Singin’ in the Rain (1952) … 4. Raging Bull (1980) … 3. Casablanca (1942) … 2. The Godfather (1972), and of course, the perennial #1 of our age, Orson Welles’ Citizen Kane (1941).

Let me say right off that many people are tired of Citizen Kane winning the top spot in poll after poll, and I do sympathize with their position, it’s hard, I know, to see the same film at number one all the time, but I’m not tired of it.

I like it that a bold, innovative film, which terrified Hollywood and New York and cities in between, and which was literally buried by several factions of American culture working overtime — successfully, mind you — to destroy its young creator’s chance of ever having a decent filmmaking career, a movie so threatening to the fabric of consensual reality that it was hardly screened anywhere in the world for the first 20 years of its existence, has triumphed over all and is recognized by today’s moviemakers and pundits as a beacon for what movies should aspire to and be.

I like that a lot.  (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #11: 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY *****

Thursday, June 14th, 2007

(This is an updated, expanded version of a review first posted in the fall of 2001)

2001-14.jpg

“I intended the film to be an intensely subjective experience that reaches the viewer at an inner level of consciousness, just as music does; to ‘explain’ a Beethoven symphony would be to emasculate it by erecting an artificial barrier between conception and appreciation.”

– Stanley Kubrick, (1968)

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968, US-UK)

running time: 2 hr., 19 m. / original studio: MGM / original MPAA rating: G

directed & produced by Stanley Kubrick; screenplay by Stanley Kubrick & Arthur C. Clarke; director of photography, Geoffrey Unsworth; edited by Ray Lovejoy

with: Keir Dullea (Dave Bowman), Gary Lockwood (Frank Poole), William Sylvester (Dr. Heywood Floyd), Douglas Rain (voice of HAL 9000)

Stanley Kubrick’s greatest achievement (Dr. Strangelove notwithstanding), 2001: A Space Odyssey comes closer to “pure cinema” than any other feature film I know. An ideal (and idealized) approach to film storytelling, using abstract imagery to provoke ideas and emotion in the viewer, pure cinema had been discussed prior to 2001 by moviemakers everywhere, and it still is, but this time Stanley Kubrick stopped talking and actually did it. It’s not his most entertaining film, arguably, nor his most beautiful, but it is his most beautifully made, his most ambitious, difficult and fully realized, an epic tone poem of imagery and music with a minimum of dialogue, and a gloriously entertaining film for people who want more from their movies than the usual canned answers to life’s Big Questions.

2001 is the rarest of American rarities, a movie that dares to shadowbox with the Great Nameless Unanswerable, the mother of all elephants in the room, the eternal problem of humankind’s place in the universe. Of course, it’s true that the film’s philosophical content is light as a feather, as its detractors still monotonously insist, but so what? Simplicity is vastly underrated by people who seek and demand the Big Answers (I know, I’ve done my share of seeking and demanding). (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #10: RIO BRAVO *****

Friday, May 25th, 2007

Saturday May 26 is the 100th anniversary of John Wayne’s birth. We can be sure that many pundits on the Duke Centennial, having consulted their handbooks on politically correct sound bytes about dead conservative movie stars, will repeat the accepted wisdom that his disturbing (and uneven) performance in John Ford’s The Searchers is his greatest moment, precisely because it is so out-of-character with his usual persona.

Well, I say nuts to that. The John Wayne persona loved by millions was a virile, dependable action hero who was hard on the bad guy and kind to abandoned women, kidnapped children, gimpy old men and stray dogs. And take all that hype about John Ford in small amounts, too: Raoul Walsh gave John Wayne his first break, ten years before Ford deigned to cast him in a movie, while no one did more to bring out his best side than the great Howard Hawks:

bravo1.jpg

Rio Bravo (1959)

running time: 2 hr., 21 m. / original studio: Warner Brothers

directed & produced by Howard Hawks; screenplay by Jules Furthman and Leigh Brackett, from story by B.H. McCampbell; director of photography, Russell Harlan; edited by Folmar Blangsted; music by Dimitri Tiomkin

with: John Wayne (John T. Chance), Dean Martin (Dude), Ricky Nelson (Colorado), Angie Dickinson (Feathers), Walter Brennan (Stumpy)

Like many films that are now regarded as masterworks by critics and film buffs, Rio Bravo was once considered no big deal, written off for decades as just another entertaining Howard Hawks Western. But in the last ten years or so, the stakes have gone down sufficiently for opinion-mongers to see past their own biases — against the star system, and films that are “only” meant to entertain, and particularly against Westerns — and declare Rio Bravo one of the best American films ever made. An agreeable character study with a finely tuned funny bone, it’s the quintessential Hawks movie, an ensemble piece that closely follows the director’s favorite adventure formula, and the culminating panel in a triptych on the subject of grace under pressure.

Beginning with the brilliant Only Angels Have Wings (1939), a movie about barnstorming aviators defying death and love (!) in a remote South American outpost, Hawks discovered a way to romanticize the trait that he valued most in other people, professional competence, and to turn its obstacles (any personal relationship) and problems (staying alive) into an intoxicating mixture of thrills and camaraderie. He turned around and did it again with To Have and Have Not (1944), changing the setting to the Caribbean, switching out movie stars, and adjusting the emphasis he placed on certain subplots. Though its wartime intrigue was packed with stirring human emotions, most of those emotions fell under the category of Major Fun; the ultimate effect of To Have and Have Not was that of a party attended by some of your favorite people, which you don’t really want to leave. This is not unlike the agenda of most Hollywood movies, even yet. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #9: THE SILENCE OF THE LAMBS ****½

Wednesday, April 11th, 2007

(In the spirit of the Shotgun relaunch, and while I’m busy with movie polls and such, I’ve decided to recycle some of my earliest home video reviews into the new format. Since most of what I was reviewing back then were classic or nearly classic films anyway, I thought they deserved a new airing.

This first recycled offering was originally posted in August of 2001. I’ve updated some of the information and added, uhm, one or two notes, as is my wont.)

The Silence of the Lambs (1991)

claricelecter.jpg

1 hr., 58 m. / original studio: Orion Pictures / rated R

directed by Jonathan Demme; screenplay by Ted Tally, from novel by Thomas Harris; director of photography, Tak Fujimoto; edited by Craig McKay; music by Howard Shore

with: Jodie Foster (Clarice Starling), Anthony Hopkins (Hannibal Lecter), Scott Glenn (Jack Crawford), Ted Levine (Buffalo Bill)

As part of the FBI’s attempt to profile a serial killer who skins his victims, a female trainee is assigned to gain the trust of a psychotic genius being held in ultra-maximum security.

A riveting thriller-cum-horror tale, The Silence of the Lambs is one of the all-time great box-office sleepers, rivaling Hitchcock’s Psycho (1960) as a media phenomenon in its initial release and establishing the character of Dr. Hannibal Lecter as a contemporary icon of dread to rank with the likes of Dracula. Sixteen years later The Silence of the Lambs has lost none of its power as one of the most disturbing movies ever made, a superior, modern gothic entertainment which gazes fearlessly into the darkest labyrinth of human psychosis and leaves us deeply unsettled, but safe, when it ends. At least, safe for the moment. (more…)

Shotgun Reviews: The Relaunch Commences

Monday, February 26th, 2007

Greetings and welcome to the new ShotgunReviews.com. Since 1999, we’ve done our best to give you worthwhile (and often funny) reviews and columns, and it’s time to shake off the rust and do it a little differently. We’ve kicked around a few ideas regarding how we’d do this new thing, and we hope you like what you see.

The new design comes to us from Barb Hallock, a student of mine with the appropriate attitude for this place (that is, bad). The more bloggish format puts us more on par with the current landscape. After all, we’ve been doing this almost eight full years. It was time for a big change. I think that you’ll agree that the new format, with a huge list of categories and easy searching, is a good one.

As part of that big change, we’ve brought in an influx of new talent from a variety of places. The entirety of our Best Shots team, responsible for the Best Shots column that runs every Monday at Newsarama.com, is now operating here in several capacities. You’ll also meet several talented young writers, including Barb herself, who will be tackling a variety of topics.

However, if you’re one of the rare folks that has read us since 1999, don’t get too worried. Shawn Delaney will still grace us with terrific music reviews, as will Jonathan Birdsong and the Lyrical Lounge crew. The Russ is back on wrestling coverage in full force. L.I. Rapkin’s already kicking in some culture. Eric Barker’s already opened the film vaults. And they aren’t the only familiar faces lurking around.

In the next few days and weeks, you’ll see the roster expand a little more and you’ll see some new recurring columns and features that we hope will become favorites. If you want to check out the old stuff, the old site currently still exists in its full glory under the archive button. If you want to talk about any of the stuff, old or new, visit our newly established forums.

So there’s my big speech. Enjoy yourselves, express yourselves, and invite friends. ShotgunReviews.com never went away, but we are most certainly back. Thanks for your time.

Being Mr. Obscure

Thursday, February 22nd, 2007

 march.jpgSometimes family and friends call me “Mr. Obscure,” because my movie-watching habits, besides being obsessive and near total, tend fanatically toward films that aren’t exactly on the New Release wall at Blockbuster. This holds true whether I’m bringing home some damned foreign language thing without stars that all the PC critics have recommended, or trying to tape half a day’s programming off of TCM (you know, Turner Classic Movies) to watch later, after I’ve consumed the latest Netflix arrivals.

In this way, I can avoid getting a life while staying busier than a one-legged man in an ass-kicking contest. It’s not possible to see everything, but I go through long spells of giving it a good try, interrupted just every now and then by a quasi-Zen determination to be happy with what I’ve seen so far in my life.

But I’m not to that point right now, not with TCM doing their “31 Days of Oscar” marathon (a holdover name from the century when the Academy Awards were in March). Lots of films I haven’t deigned to see yet from the vast Classic Hollywood period, and some of them pretty satisfyingly obscure, too, like Wednesday’s T-Men (1947), which is an early Anthony Mann noir about treasury agents going undercover in the mob to root out counterfeiters.

(more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #8: CASABLANCA *****

Monday, January 9th, 2006

Stuck at home on a Saturday night in the middle of winter? Well, melt some butter, pop some corn, turn out the lights and press “play”on

Casablanca (1942)

casablanca15.jpg

running time: 1hr., 42m. / original studio: Warner Brothers

produced by Hal B. Wallis; directed by Michael Curtiz; screenplay by Julius J. and Philip G. Epstein, and Howard Koch, from the play Everybody Comes to Rick’s by Murray Burnett and Joan Alison

director of photography, Arthur Edeson; edited by Owen Marks; music by Max Steiner

with: Humphrey Bogart (Rick), Ingrid Bergman (Ilsa), Paul Henreid (Victor), Claude Rains (Louis), Conrad Veidt (Maj. Strasser), Peter Lorre (Ugarte)

French Morocco, just before America’s entry into WWII: a mysterious Yankee is drawn into political intrigue when the only woman he ever loved shows up, escorted by a famous Czech resistance leader.

Currently the most beloved film from Classic Hollywood (circa 1930 to 1960), Casablanca is also one of the most talked about and written about movies of all time. Everyone has an opinion on why it works, everyone who contributed to the script or the production claimed credit for its diverse charms, and both sides of the Art/Commerce debate point to it as the exception to a rule. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #7: BONNIE AND CLYDE *****

Sunday, August 28th, 2005

Had to take a month off while I moved across country, but I’m back extolling the true classics with a still-controversial favorite:

bonnie_clyde7.jpg

“Some day they’ll go down together; / They’ll bury them side-by-side; /

To few it’ll be grief - / To the law a relief -

But it’s death for Bonnie and Clyde.”

– Bonnie Parker, 1934

Bonnie and Clyde (1967)

running time: 1 hr., 51 m. / original studio: Warner Brothers / original rating: M

produced by Warren Beatty; directed by Arthur Penn; screenplay by David Newman & Robert Benton; director of photography, Burnett Guffey; edited by Dede Allen; music by Charles Strouse

with: Warren Beatty (Clyde Barrow), Faye Dunaway (Bonnie Parker), Michael J. Pollard (C.W. Moss), Gene Hackman (Buck Barrow), Estelle Parsons (Blanche)

One of the most important and influential films ever made, Bonnie and Clyde forms a locus in modern film history: it was intimately tied to the mid-sixties zeitgeist, by both caprice and design, and it was the decade’s most significant harbinger of a new era in American filmmaking, launching numerous great careers on both sides of the camera and transforming the visual language of Hollywood cinema. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #6: VERTIGO *****

Wednesday, June 15th, 2005

“Too late. It’s too late, there’s no bringing her back.”

- Scottie Ferguson

 vertigo5.jpg

Vertigo (1958)

running time: 2 hr., 7 m. / original studio: Paramount Pictures

produced & directed by Alfred Hitchcock; screenplay by Alec Coppel & Samuel Taylor, from novel D’Entre les Morts by Pierre Boileau and Thomas Narcejac; director of photography, Robert Burks; edited by George Tomasini; music by Bernard Herrmann

with: James Stewart (Scottie), Kim Novak (Madeleine/Judy), Barbara Bel Geddes (Midge), Tom Helmore (Gavin Elster)

If ever there was a movie that illustrated the unpredictable whims of art and commerce, it is Alfred Hitchcock’s Vertigo. When first released in the summer of 1958, during the most productive and profitable era of Hitchcock’s career, Vertigo was a box-office disappointment, considered by audiences and critics alike to be nothing more than an unsatisfying curiosity from a popular entertainer. But as film studies blossomed in the sixties and Hitchcock’s image began to change, Vertigo accumulated recognition from many different quarters around the world, gaining in stature until it is now regarded as one of the greatest films ever made, a hypnotic masterpiece of uncomfortable insight and disturbing beauty. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #5: GOLDFINGER ****½

Friday, May 20th, 2005

In May, the moviegoer’s fancy turns wistfully to the sustained adrenalin rush. It’s an appropriate time, then, to revisit the granddaddy of modern action/adventure movies:

goldfinger1.jpg

Goldfinger (1964)

running time: 1 hr., 52 m. / original studio: United Artists

produced by: Harry Saltzman and Albert R. Broccoli

directed by Guy Hamilton; screenplay by Richard Maibaum and Paul Dehn, from novel by Ian Fleming; director of photography, Ted Moore; edited by Peter Hunt; music by John Barry

with: Sean Connery (James Bond), Honor Blackman (Pussy Galore), Gert Fröbe (Auric Goldfinger), Harold Sakata (Oddjob), Shirley Eaton (Jill Masterson)

Woman: My name is Pussy Galore.

Bond: I must be dreaming.

Visually dazzling, outlandishly funny, jazzy, sexy and unceasingly inventive, Goldfinger was the third film in the James Bond series and it remains the best. It isn’t a great movie in the Citizen Kane/Lawrence of Arabia/Godfather sense, but it is a classic guilty pleasure and a landmark film from a turbulent decade, bursting with a period style and panache that changed moviemaking and moviegoing in ways which are still with us, for better and for worse. For instance: there had been many blockbuster movies before, single films that somehow hit the right chords with the paying audience, but Goldfinger turned the Bond movies into the first blockbuster franchise, a studio chief’s wet dream, a brand name that was guaranteed to pack houses every time. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #4: AMADEUS *****

Thursday, April 28th, 2005

Mozart: Do you believe in it?…A fire which never dies, burning you forever?

Salieri: (a pause) Oh, yes.

Amadeus (1984)

amadeus2.jpg

running time: 2 hr., 40 m. / original studio: Orion / original rating: PG

directed by Milos Forman; screenplay by Peter Shaffer, from his play; director of photography, Miroslav Ondricek; edited by Michael Chandler; music supervisor: Sir Neville Marriner conducting the Academy of St. Martin-in-the-Fields

with: F. Murray Abraham (Salieri), Tom Hulce (Mozart), Elizabeth Berridge (Constanze Mozart), Simon Callow (Emanuel Schikaneder)

The confessions of Antonio Salieri, a classical composer who claimed that he murdered Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart.

Made near the middle of the 1980s, a decade generally known for the triumph of crass commercialism over any kind of aesthetic value in the movies, Amadeus is the exception to the rule, a sensuous fantasia in period costume that speculates upon one of life’s greatest mysteries, the origin and nature of musical genius, with unapologetic wit, exuberance and style. I know of no other film in English that uses cinematic grammar so deftly, with such mastery of its highs and lows, to convey emotions and ideas that should be inexplicable: the all-consuming experience of creativity at its peak; the exhilaration of recognizing a true, almost magical brilliance in another person; and the damnation of a well-earned, inextinguishable jealousy. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #3: BRINGING UP BABY *****

Tuesday, March 15th, 2005

Bringing Up Baby (1938)

baby1.jpg

running time: 1 hr., 42 m. / original studio: RKO

produced & directed by Howard Hawks; screenplay by Dudley Nichols & Hagar Wilde, from story by Wilde; director of photography, Russell Metty; edited by George Hively

with: Katharine Hepburn (Susan), Cary Grant (David), Charlie Ruggles (Maj. Applegate), May Robson (Aunt Elizabeth)

A zany socialite sets her cap for a handsome paleontologist, but her plans are skewed by the arrival of an unwanted gift: a full-grown leopard.

The very essence of screwball comedy, and in many ways its zenith, Bringing Up Baby is an hour and three-quarters of stylishly choreographed madness, starring two of the most compelling and dazzling movie stars in the history of the medium, Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn. A virtual catalogue of pratfalls, mistaken identities, outlandish double-entendre, continuous plot reversals and escalating comic mayhem, Bringing Up Baby is almost exhausting the first time you watch it, so much is being fired at you at any given moment. But it is well worth multiple viewings. This is among the handful of movies that just grow funnier and funnier, and frankly astonishing, each time you see them. (more…)

Barker’s Classic Movies #2: INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS *****

Tuesday, February 22nd, 2005

For February, with the noise of Oscar season reaching its zenith, I’m going to be churlish and recommend a movie that didn’t receive a single nomination, from anyone, anywhere…

invasion4.jpg

Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956)

running time: 1h., 20m. / original studio: Allied Artists

directed by Don Siegel; screenplay by Daniel Mainwaring, from Collier’s Magazine serial The Body Snatchers by Jack Finney; director of photography, Ellsworth Fredericks; edited by Robert S. Eisen; music by Carmen Dragonwith: Kevin McCarthy (Dr. Miles Bennell), Dana Wynter (Becky Driscoll), Larry Gates (Dr. Dan Kauffman), King Donovan (Jack Bellicec), Carolyn Jones (Teddy Bellicec)

“People are pods. Many of my associates are certainly pods…To be a pod means that you have no passion, no anger, the spark has left you…of course, there’s a very strong case for being a pod…It happens to leave you in a very dull world but that, by the way, is the world that most of us live in.” — director Don Siegel

“They’re here already! You’re next! You’re next!” — Kevin McCarthy as Dr. Miles Bennell

There isn’t a wasted moment in one of my all-time favorite movies, Don Siegel’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, a nightmarish little masterpiece that tapped into and articulated the general unease which crept across America as the Cold War took shape. It has often been misread as an allegory for conservative paranoia over the spread of Communism, but Invasion is a much smarter movie than that — much smarter. A science fiction thriller about dehumanization and denial in a century of monstrous crimes, Invasion of the Body Snatchers can support multiple interpretations, including the opposite view that it is a pointed critique of McCarthyism. As the Saturday Night Live joke used to go, “It’s a floor wax and a dessert topping!” It’s a right-wing fantasy, it’s a left-wing fantasy, it’s neither and both, a fever dream of America in troubled times, made right in the center of those troubled times.

The plot of Invasion is practically American folklore by now, although thankfully its characters don’t know that: Dr. Miles Bennell returns early from a convention to his hometown of Santa Mira because many of his patients have been asking for him. People he’s known all his life have suddenly become convinced that their family members are imposters, and despite every bromide that Miles can fabricate out of his own scientific prejudices, nothing convinces them otherwise. And then, twenty-four hours later everything is fine, as if all they had to do was sleep on it and wake up cured.

And that is exactly how the genuinely creepy invaders of this film have taken over — not with spectacular war machines destroying American landmarks willy-nilly, but through seed pods from space that silently, peacefully, steal our bodies and minds while we’re sleeping. The only thing wrong with the pods’ otherwise perfect replication of human beings is their placidity, their self-satisfied lack of compassion. As a matter of fact, if you want to get the pod people really stirred up, just show some emotion and you’ll have a whole town full of them after you.

Shot in twenty-three days for just half a million dollars, Invasion is an exemplar of low budget storytelling, unfolding tersely, using up just enough running time to introduce Miles, the townspeople, and a hint of romance with his old flame Becky Driscoll, and then the bottom drops out and the film slides headlong toward chaos without a pause. Its dreadful premise is not the mere threat of an impending takeover by inhuman creatures but the slow, horrific dawning that, as Miles screams at the finale, they’re here already, dim bulb. The invasion is over, and there’s no one left except you.

The argument that Invasion is paranoid, anti-Red propaganda hinges on the idea that a Communist takeover of America would be just this sort of insidious, quiet invasion: nothing would seem to be going wrong on the surface, and then one day you would just wake up without your capitalist soul. Like a McCarthyite’s fantasy of life in a Commie world, the film’s pod people have a regimented, unquestioning society, illustrated in one of the film’s most disturbing scenes: Miles and Becky watching in disbelief as their former friends and neighbors gather in the Santa Mira town square, casually lining up behind trucks filled with fresh pods, receiving orders to distribute the things in an ever widening circle outside the city limits.

Actual pod philosophy, however, contradicts the whole Red Scare reading. As Dr. Kauffman, Miles’ pleasant, disarming colleague, sums it up: “Now just think, less than a month ago Santa Mira was like any other town. People with nothing but problems. Then out of the sky came a solution…There’s no pain. Suddenly while you’re asleep, (the pods will) absorb your minds. Your memories. And you’re reborn into an untroubled world.”

An untroubled world: Kauffman speaks in the reasonable and soothing tones of an appliance salesman, or a Midwestern minister. It’s the language of advertising, not the Comintern, it’s the constant, gentle prodding from the consumer society telling you to buy off your discomfort, remake yourself without effort, and don’t worry, be happy. Later, as Miles eavesdrops on his secretary’s living room, looking for a friend, any friend, he overhears her giving orders to place a pod in her own baby’s crib, “and then there’ll be no more tears.”

This movie is paranoid, all right: it’s deathly afraid we’ll finally find that all-purpose, single-dose sedative for which Americans have always yearned, the one that will permanently kill the pain of doubt, suffering, and empathy with others. The pod people have absolutely no interest in overturning the status quo; they’re all about keeping things exactly as they’ve always been, only without the cognitive dissonance that should be every person’s birthright in the age of nuclear weapons and state sponsored genocide.

* * *

Invasion of the Body Snatchers opens with a distinct film noir atmosphere, capturing real locations with high contrast photography, the shadows deepening with the first nightfall (the whole film takes place over a manic two-and-a-half days). But as the mystery of what is happening to Santa Mira starts coming to the surface, Siegel effortlessly switches over to film noir’s stylistic grandfather German Expressionism, with its skewed angles and distorted perspectives, giving the film a lasting tinge of madness. Prior to this movie, Siegel’s forte had always been keeping it simple on a tight budget and here he outdid himself, making cheap special effects work by using them creatively and sparingly, and applying basic film craft — expressive lighting, clever editing, great character faces — to make one of the best films of the 1950s from any genre.

Of course, since it was the fifties and the film was science fiction, Invasion wasn’t reviewed by a single major critic of the day. Siegel tried, knowing he had made the best film of his career so far, by arranging free screenings for the press but he was conspicuously ignored. No self-respecting critic of the day would stoop to reviewing a small indie film about something that could never happen. Even so, Invasion did modestly well at the box office, turning a profit for the studio because, as often happens, the much-maligned audience was a step ahead of both critics and exhibitors.

But Invasion made its real impact later, after French cineastes discovered Don Siegel and started calling him an auteur, and then Allied Artists started leasing its catalogue to television stations, where the film played late shows after the local news. That was how I first saw it, as an eleven-year-old of the sixties, sitting on the floor in front of the TV after the rest of the family was in bed. Already an aficionado of weird and fantastic cinema, I thought it had some really good, exciting scenes, though it didn’t particularly scare me.

Actually, Invasion scares me a lot more now. I was a sophisticated viewer then, but not so much that I understood things like political witch hunts and the ever-lurking madness of crowds, or that the Everyday world sometimes harbors a fascist element (it’s called conformity), or that there is a struggle to keep your humanity as you get older, when a long memory becomes entangled with betrayed ideals, betrayed relationships, and an historical awareness of what can happen when fear takes over a society. These are the things going bump in the suburban night of Don Siegel’s Invasion of the Body Snatchers, which is more akin to a ghost story for adults than it is a straight horror movie. If it is allegorical, then its true subject is the anxiety felt by an overworked culture that never gets enough sleep, and that consequently feels a slow draining of hope and love from the world.

Though Invasion has been remade twice, first by Philip (The Right Stuff) Kaufman in 1978, and then by Abel (Bad Lieutenant) Ferrara in 1994, both films in color, both with bigger budgets and marquee names, neither version comes close to the sense of mounting hysteria Siegel’s film achieves in just eighty minutes. The remakes are exercises in belaboring the point, and the well-known Hollywood tendency to carelessly screw around with what was done right the first time. The original remains the gold standard of fifties science fiction cinema because, moment-by-moment, it projects an earned awareness of the violation we feel when our house — or our worldview — has been robbed.

Invasion isn’t a perfect movie, but I think the imperfections only add to its glory as the consummate low budget chiller. The music by Carmen Dragon (yes, a real person’s name) is of a style that has gone out of fashion, overbearing and jarring, but it keeps viewers’ attention where it belongs. This isn’t a film to relax with: Remember what happens to those who fall asleep. And the framing device, in which a crazed Miles tells his story to a skeptical psychiatrist, is a famous example of a studio imposing a so-called happy ending where it wasn’t needed, but in the end it fails to dilute what has gone before. Siegel was forced to come back to the film and add it on, seven months after production had wrapped, yet he devised a brilliant little set piece which harkens back to the first great work of film Expressionism, The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1919). In that movie, too, a madman tells the tale, only the twist at the end is, well, he’s a madman. The final twist of Siegel’s film inverts the Caligari effect: Miles is certainly raving, but he has good reason.

Invasion has sometimes been shown in a “Director’s Cut,” without the framing story and shortened by four minutes, but the truth is, nothing could soften the impact of Miles’ journey from complacent, small town doctor to terrified, hunted man. This was a common side effect of both Noir and Expressionist styles: they take us so deeply into the shadows of a movie’s world that no happy-fied finale, however well-crafted, can cover the taste of dark truth, or pure fear, or pitiless Fate, which has formed the center of the film (for instance, It’s a Wonderful Life, 1946).

Very well acted by an ensemble of working professionals, many of whom will be familiar to fans of Nick-at-Nite. Great moments to look forward to: the body on the pool table awakening; the pods in the greenhouse, stealing identities during a dinner party; Miles and Becky fleeing Santa Mira with sirens blaring and the whole town on their heels; and that final, blood-curdling kiss.

NOTES:

Released 49 years ago this month, in February 1956.

Selected for preservation by the National Film Registry in 1994.

DID McCARTHY GET THE PART BECAUSE OF HIS NAME?: the film’s star Kevin McCarthy (b. 1914) is the younger brother of novelist Mary McCarthy (The Group) and the cousin of former Democratic Presidential candidate Eugene McCarthy. He made his film debut in 1944 and has more than fifty films and forty television shows to his credit, including a winking appearance in the ’70s remake of Invasion. Still acting at the age of 91, he has toured the U.S. for the last 20 years in Give ‘Em Hell, Harry, the one-character play about Harry Truman.

THE WRITERS: novelist Jack Finney (1911-1995) worked in several genres besides science fiction, including mysteries and literary fiction. The Body Snatchers is one of his more unsettling efforts. Finney scoffed at the idea that social conformity was its real subject, but there is little doubt he was dealing with the loss of compassion in uncertain times, and the human tendency to escape into utopian solutions, a frequent theme in his work.

The film version’s decidedly noir edge comes from adapter Daniel Mainwaring (1902-1977). An unusual screenwriter for any era, he managed to work steadily and without a break for almost thirty years in the movie business. He also had time to be a pulp novelist, writing Build My Gallows High under a pseudonym and then adapting it for the screen himself, where it became Out of the Past (1947), one of the essential films noir.

The great writer-director Sam Peckinpah (1925-1984), notoriously difficult to get along with, later claimed that he was the person responsible for the quality of the Invasion script, often telling interviewers that he’d done a complete, uncredited rewrite on location. He may have touched up a few scenes during the shoot, and he did win himself a walk-on role as a meter reader in Miles’ basement, but the verifiable facts are that Daniel Mainwaring finally complained to the Writers Guild, and they told Peckinpah to put a lid on it. Apparently, creating an American classic, The Wild Bunch (1969), wasn’t good enough for him.

SLUMMING, AND HAPPILY: Like several other B-moviemakers of the fifties, Don Siegel (1912-1991) had a more distinguished background than he admitted to, studying at Cambridge and the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art in England. He began as a second unit director and editor for Warner Brothers in the thirties and forties, then directed many potboilers of the fifties with imaginative style and speed. Especially notable for the quip, “If you shake a movie, ten minutes will fall out,” he received due recognition in the U.S. rather late in his career, after making Clint Eastwood into a superstar with the challenging Dirty Harry (1971). Eastwood has often credited Siegel as his mentor, both as an actor and director.

Siegel’s work sometimes appears ideologically motivated, but only if you’re looking for it; he cannot be pinned down to left or right. Other worthwhile films by this secretly thoughtful craftsman: Riot in Cell Block 11 (1954), The Killers (1964), The Beguiled (1971), Charley Varrick (1973), The Shootist (1976).

THE DVD: Artisan Entertainment released an excellent widescreen transfer of Invasion in 1998, at the dawn of the DVD revolution. It still works fine. There are no extras to speak of, but they’re not missed; the movie’s the thing, and no-extras also means very affordable ($10 at DVD Planet).

If you’ve only seen the pan-and-scan version on the late show, you’ll be blown away by cinematographer Ellsworth Fredericks’ fantastic compositions. Though the original film was cropped for a 2:1 widescreen back in ’56, it’s still like getting an all new movie. The pan-and-scan versions (sometimes called Full Screen) have been made from that same cropped image, which is why they’re always grainy and slightly out of focus.

Eric Barker is an independent filmmaker and writer living in Denver.

Barker’s Classic Movies #1 was The Treasure of the Sierra Madre

Barker’s Classic Movies #1: THE TREASURE OF THE SIERRA MADRE *****

Wednesday, January 12th, 2005

In the age of DVD, Netflix and Turner Classic Movies, there’s never an excuse to be bored. Each month, Eric Barker offers up a cinematic treat, the best of the best from 110 years of moviemaking, the films that you should know, and love, and collect, and why…

 The Treasure of the Sierra Madre (1948)

treasure4.jpg

2h., 6m. / original studio: Warner Brothers

directed by John Huston; screenplay by John Huston, from novel by B. Traven; director of photography, Ted McCord; edited by Owen Marks; music by Max Steiner

with: Humphrey Bogart (Dobbs), Walter Huston (Howard), Tim Holt (Curtin), Bruce Bennett (Cody), Barton MacLane (Pat McCormick), Alfonso Bedoya (Gold Hat)

“You know, the worst ain’t so bad when it finally happens. Not half as bad as you figure it’ll be before it’s happened.” — Tim Holt as Curtin

One of the true wonders of Classic Hollywood and one of the best movies ever made, John Huston’s The Treasure of the Sierra Madre is a singularity in the annals of American moviemaking, a big budget, major studio film so far off the beaten track, it would frighten away any self respecting film executive even yet. (more…)