Lies, Damned Lies, and Marvel Comics
Wow.
Just wow.
I’ve long since realized that Marvel went from general huckster-ism to outright lying, but I’m constantly amazed by how much they’re putting the spotlight on their own lies.
Tom Brevoort: McNiven’s involvement with the Spidey launch actually predates Steve Wacker’s involvement, and goes back to Civil War. As we were wrapping up that series, McNiven and I had been chatting about what he should do next (he was looking for a gig with a single lead character, to no one’s surprise), and I was beginning to plan the Spidey relaunch.
It had been Marvel’s public position that Spider-Man was being unmasked to stay unmasked for a very long time. Joe Quesada was adamant about that in his New Joe Fridays interviews. But they were already planning the Spidey relaunch at the end of Civil War? So…they already knew they’d have a magic fix ready for it, when Joe said there was no magic fix ready for it. Mind you…they may not have been sure they were going to do it, but they knew were ready to do away with this aspect that had so much potential for great stories, according to editorial.
THEY.
LIE.
FREQUENTLY.
Explore posts in the same categories: Comics, Kevin Huxford, Op-Ed
January 31st, 2008 at 12:58 pm
Marvel create works of fiction. As a result, they lie when promoting it. They’re hardly alone…
January 31st, 2008 at 2:03 pm
Like when you said “The Flying Friar” can cure psoraisis?
Thanks, Rich. I’m still itching.
January 31st, 2008 at 2:06 pm
“Marvel create works of fiction. As a result, they lie when promoting it.”
What. The. Fuck.
Selling fiction doesn’t absolve lying in public reality.
Your lawyers will be hearing from mine as soon as I can stop itching long enough to pick up the phone and call them. :p
February 1st, 2008 at 11:08 am
It’s actually worse than that — they’ve said outright in other interviews that the only reason they did the unmasking was to set up the retcon.