Saturday May 26 is the 100th anniversary of John Wayne’s birth. We can be sure that many pundits on the Duke Centennial, having consulted their handbooks on politically correct sound bytes about dead conservative movie stars, will repeat the accepted wisdom that his disturbing (and uneven) performance in John Ford’s The Searchers is his greatest moment, precisely because it is so out-of-character with his usual persona.
Well, I say nuts to that. The John Wayne persona loved by millions was a virile, dependable action hero who was hard on the bad guy and kind to abandoned women, kidnapped children, gimpy old men and stray dogs. And take all that hype about John Ford in small amounts, too: Raoul Walsh gave John Wayne his first break, ten years before Ford deigned to cast him in a movie, while no one did more to bring out his best side than the great Howard Hawks:

Rio Bravo (1959)
running time: 2 hr., 21 m. / original studio: Warner Brothers
directed & produced by Howard Hawks; screenplay by Jules Furthman and Leigh Brackett, from story by B.H. McCampbell; director of photography, Russell Harlan; edited by Folmar Blangsted; music by Dimitri Tiomkin
with: John Wayne (John T. Chance), Dean Martin (Dude), Ricky Nelson (Colorado), Angie Dickinson (Feathers), Walter Brennan (Stumpy)
Like many films that are now regarded as masterworks by critics and film buffs, Rio Bravo was once considered no big deal, written off for decades as just another entertaining Howard Hawks Western. But in the last ten years or so, the stakes have gone down sufficiently for opinion-mongers to see past their own biases — against the star system, and films that are “only” meant to entertain, and particularly against Westerns — and declare Rio Bravo one of the best American films ever made. An agreeable character study with a finely tuned funny bone, it’s the quintessential Hawks movie, an ensemble piece that closely follows the director’s favorite adventure formula, and the culminating panel in a triptych on the subject of grace under pressure.
Beginning with the brilliant Only Angels Have Wings (1939), a movie about barnstorming aviators defying death and love (!) in a remote South American outpost, Hawks discovered a way to romanticize the trait that he valued most in other people, professional competence, and to turn its obstacles (any personal relationship) and problems (staying alive) into an intoxicating mixture of thrills and camaraderie. He turned around and did it again with To Have and Have Not (1944), changing the setting to the Caribbean, switching out movie stars, and adjusting the emphasis he placed on certain subplots. Though its wartime intrigue was packed with stirring human emotions, most of those emotions fell under the category of Major Fun; the ultimate effect of To Have and Have Not was that of a party attended by some of your favorite people, which you don’t really want to leave. This is not unlike the agenda of most Hollywood movies, even yet. (more…)